Friday, April 17, 2009

Standing O's

Recently, Terry Teachout did a blog post at the WSJ about an incident at the Metropolitan Opera. A production of La Sonnambula was roundly booed by the audience. As Teachout points out, not only is it unusual to get booed, it is unusual not to get a standing ovation. He says:

Most of the theatrical performances I see in New York receive standing ovations. Time was when audiences reserved that special gesture for a performance of equally special merit, but in recent years it has become a near-reflexive response to anything short of a crash-and-burn disaster.
He then meditates on the art of booing and why it doesn’t happen much anymore.

This post was picked up at the Freakonomics Blog and then by other bloggers, all of whom are wondering why standing ovations are the rule and not the exception.  Ezra Klein has a theory that it has to do with the herd mentality:

People fear being wrong. The standing ovation isn't necessarily a sign of enjoyment. You might stand and clap for an utterly unpleasant play about the Holocaust. It's a sign of critical appreciation. And people don't want to be wrong about whether a play deserves an ovation. They don't want to be the boor who missed the cutting edge theory behind the endless monologues. Disliking a beautiful performance can be seen as a sign of poor taste or deficient critical faculties. As such it takes time to decide whether or not jeering is a safe response to a poor performance. Time you don't have because the audience has already taken a different path.

Audience behavior, after all, is a herd phenomenon. Standing ovations are occasionally instantaneous. But they're more often infections. Some stand, and then some others stand, and then the laggards decide that remaining seated seems churlish, and they can't see anything anyway. So they stand too. Just about no one boos while everyone else stands and cheers.

I pretty much agree with all of that.  But it got me thinking about the rare instantaneous standing ovations I've experienced.

My most vivid memory of a spontaneous ovation was a long time ago (at least 15 years ago, maybe more) at the Saint Louis Symphony Orchestra.  The program included a Mozart Piano Concerto and the guest pianist was Awadagin Pratt.  I had never heard of Pratt and I don't recall which Piano Concerto it was.  I like Mozart but much of his work runs together in my mind.

Pratt was a surprise from the first moment he walked out onto the stage. First of all, he was huge. Not fat, but big. Very tall with broad shoulders and what appeared to be huge hands (which led me to wonder why he wasn’t performing one of the works that require huge hands, Rachmaninoff for instance. But I digress.)

It was also a surprise to me that he was African American.   There just aren't many African American concert pianists, or if there are they don't visit the Saint Louis Symphony.   I remember he was dressed somewhat casually (it was a day concert as I recall) although not inappropriately.  The idea that he was casual probably was exacerbated by his dreadlocks.

But the strangest thing about him was that he did not sit on a standard piano bench but sat, instead, on a small wooden four legged stool that put him very low to the ground. When he sat down he reminded me for all the world of Schroeder in the Charlie Brown Comic strip. I remember thinking that this might be one of the extraordinary Mozart experiences I'd ever had.  

And it was.  But not because of his appearance.  Because of his playing.

It was magical. His technique was beautiful, precise and light and the sound rang through the hall, the orchestra melding into the piano solos as if soloist and orchestra were one organism. There was utter silence in the hall between the movements. Not the usual silence punctuated by coughs and shuffling, but an expectant silence. It was like being at the ballpark when a pitcher has a no hitter going and the audience is holding its breath. The moment he finished the entire audience was on its feet applauding and shouting bravo.

It was the kind of performance where total strangers turned to each other during intermission and talked about it.  It brought the crowd together.   It was a once in a lifetime experience. 

Pratt has returned and I've heard him since.  He's a fine musician and I've always enjoyed him.  But he's never had, or deserved, another spontaneous ovation.   That was a special moment and he completely deserved his Standing O.

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

CCR Symposium

No, this has nothing to do with Creedence Clearwater Revival. 

A few years ago I attended a panel discussion at the Chicago YearlyKos convention (now Netroots Nation) that was billed as "Women and Blogging."  I thought it might be an interesting discussion of how women blog in ways that are different than men, or how to be a woman and blog, or how women have been changed by blogging, or helpful hints for women who blog.  It turned out to be a panel of women bloggers who had suffered cyber harassment.  Not to minimize the problems of harassment (cyber or real life), it wasn't what I was looking for and I left before it was over.  But cyber harassment is a problem.  Finding a solution is even more of a problem. 

Recently Danielle Citron, of the University of Maryland School of Law, published Cyber Civil Rights which addressed the problem of cyber harassment from a legal perspective and recommends taking it beyond the traditional law of torts and placing it into the area of civil rights (the link takes you to the summary and the SSRN publication of the paper).  Among other things the paper discusses the infamous Kathy Sierra situation that occurred a few years ago.

I don't intend to blog substantively about law here at my little personal blog and I express no opinion regarding Professor Citron's views (in fact I consider this a post about blogging itself) but I wanted to draw everyone's attention to the Online Symposium  sponsored by the legal blog Concurring Opinions at which many legal scholars are discussing Professor Citron's paper.  I don't think it gets too deep into the legal weeds that it wouldn't be of interest to anyone who blogs or participates in online discussions.  And because the Symposium is made up of blog posts and not academic papers, it doesn't take long to read them and they are (mostly) written in plain English rather than legaleze.  

As Frank Pasquale states in his introduction to the symposium:

...we propose to discuss the following issues:

What can the law do to respond to these threats?

How we deter harassment while promoting legitimate speech?

How do we balance the privacy rights of speakers and those they speak about in the new communicative landscape created by sites like AutoAdmit, Juicy Campus, Facebook, and anonymous message boards?

The CCR Symposium will continue through Thursday but so far the following posts are available:

Frank Pasquale's Introduction to the Symposium (quoted above)

Balancing Anonymity and Accountability Online by Frank Pasquale in which he counters Citron's proposals with his own proposal of a "one bite" rule.

The Civil Rights Agenda by James Grimmelmann.  Online harassment isn't just about individual bullies and victims--though it's about that, too. It's also about pervasive patterns of abuse, directed at vulnerable groups, that effectively deprive them of the ability to participate in important social institutions.

A Mildly Skeptical Take by Orin Kerr.

Two Stories about Law's Expressive Value by David Fagundes.

Legal Responses to Online Harassment by Nathaniel Gleicher. (Recommended)

More on the Civil Rights Category by Orin Kerr.

Maybe we can't make Cyberspace better than meet space, but why allow it to be worse? by Ann Bartow. 

A Behavioral Argument for Stronger Protections by Kaimipono D. Wenger. (Recommended)

The Right to Remain Anonymous Matters by Michael Froomkin. I'm convinced that even though Prof. Citron is attacking a significant social problem, the cure proposed is (1) worse than the disease, (2) deeply unconstitutional, and (3) would have pernicious global side-effects. (Recommended).

Speech and (in)Equality by Helen Norton. I was, however, fascinated by the paper's discussion of the Violence Against Women Act's prohibition on the use of telecommunications devices to deliver certain anonymous threats or harassment. Maybe that provision can provide a helpful model for ensuring that pending legislation (like the Matthew Shepard Act) remains attentive to the various forms that civil rights injuries can take in the 21st Century.

The Rhetoric of Free Speech by Nancy Kim.  [I]t seems that Internet libertarians are using the rhetoric of free speech to vastly expand existing conceptions of speech to include all manner of previously unprotected communication or conduct, such as the posting of naked pictures of others taken without their consent, death threats, false accusations and outright lies. One of the strengths of Citron’s article is that it calls out such conduct for what it is rather than what some would prefer to call it. (Recommended)

As I said, the CCR Symposium will be going on through Thursday and I expect many other thought provoking posts will be available.

Monday, April 13, 2009

This & That: Music, Travel, Books, etc.

Some stuff:

  • A local artist is putting the words of Meriwether Lewis to music. Words like: "heartily tired of the national hug".
  • My friends Meg and Adam have finished the South American half of their year traveling around the world. Starting in Peru, they moved on to Bolivia, Argentina and Chile before spending a final three weeks in Columbia. I admit I was nervous about them being in Columbia but they say it was beautiful and the people were lovely. After a brief stop back in the States they have moved on to spend a month in New Zealand where they are traveling around by spaceship. Then they head to Asia. Jealous? Me? What makes you think that?
  • I've made it to the last of Laura Lippman's Tess Monaghan mysteries. I'm really impressed how she doesn't repeat herself with plots (although shooting people at the end of the novel is starting to get predictable). I finished The Last Place which involved a serial killer (and had references back to the very first book too). It was really creepy and I found I couldn't read it late at night. In By A Spider's Thread she took the action out of town again (southern Indiana no less - I'd like Andi's opinion on if she got it right). But she avoided the problems I had with her when she sent Tess to Texas by creating a network of female investigators that Tess could call on for the out of town work. That worked really well (in fact I'll probably write more about that at some point.) As I read this series I did regularly wonder if she was purposely trying not to cover Baltimore ground that David Simon covers, but then came No Good Deeds. It had a different twist though - it ended up being a meditation on the power that the federal government has to make the life of an average citizen miserable if it so chooses. I just picked up Another Thing to Fall from the library and when I finish that, I'm finished. Sigh.
  • I had jury duty today and I brought Anna Karenina with me to read. I assumed I'd be there two days (that's what usually happens) and I'd have a lot of downtime (that also usually happens). But I only had to serve one day and most of it was spent in an actual courtroom going through voir dire. They didn't pick me (no surprise there) but I also didn't get much reading time in. I only have about 200 more pages to go - I just need some uninterrupted time when I'm not too tired. I thought for sure that jury duty would provide that. Wrong. But I did my civic duty.

The Pirates of Penzance at OTSL

    The Opera:  Frederic has turned 21 which marks the end of his apprenticeship with the Pirate King (he was supposed to be apprenticed to ...